Home
Help

Latest News

Related Coverage
A week of stories from the Boston Globe's Washington bureau

Latest News
National
International
Washington, D.C.

Sections Boston Globe Online: Page One Nation | World Metro | Region Business Sports Living | Arts Editorials

Weekly
Health | Science (Mon.)
Food (Wed.)
Calendar (Thu.)
At Home (Thu.)
Picture This (Fri.)

Sunday
Automotive
Focus
Learning
Magazine
New England
Real Estate
Travel
City Weekly
South Weekly
West Weekly
North Weekly
NorthWest Weekly
NH Weekly

Features
Archives
Book Reviews
Columns
Comics
Crossword
Horoscopes
Death Notices
Lottery
Movie Reviews
Music Reviews
Obituaries
Today's stories A-Z
TV & Radio
Weather

Classifieds
Autos
Classifieds
Help Wanted
Real Estate

Help
Contact the Globe
Send us feedback

Alternative views
Low-graphics version
Acrobat version (.pdf)

Search the Globe:

Today
Yesterday

Search the Web
Using Altavista:


The Boston Globe OnlineBoston.com Boston Globe Online / Nation | World
[ Send this story to a friend | Easy-print version | Add to Daily User ]

Study says natural light boosts learning

By Kenneth J. Cooper the Washington Post, 11/26/99

chool districts across the nation have scrambled to find a solution to dismal student performance on standardized tests, trying alternative curriculums, different teaching methods, new textbooks, better trained teachers, smaller classes, after-school tutors, Saturday sessions, even longer school years.

But for the most part, school officials have yet to take a close look at the physical space where learning takes place - the classroom. Could a partial solution to the problem be to improve the lighting there?

A California architecture consulting firm thinks so, based on its study on the effect of classroom lighting on achievement levels. The study by the Heschong Mahone Group based near Sacramento found that students who took their lessons in classrooms with more natural light scored up to 25 percent higher on standardized tests than other students in the same school district.

The study, billed as the first rigorous one of its kind, appears to confirm what some school designers have asserted based on anecdotal evidence: children learn better under illumination from skylights or windows, rather than light bulbs.

The main theories for why this might be the case are that ''daylighting'' enhances learning by boosting the eyesight, mood and/or health of students and their teachers.

John B. Lyons, an Education Department official who monitors school construction, was briefed on the study last month and came away impressed. ''It's one of the first studies that shows a clear correlation'' between daylight and achievement, Lyons said.

Joseph Villani, associate director of the National School Boards Association, whose membership controls school construction, said the study focused on the kind of ''human engineering'' issues that school boards should consider in awarding design contracts. ''It's almost common sense if you look at what people prefer,'' Villani said. ''Most people prefer to have some daylight.''

While the Heschong Mahone study is the first to evaluate daylight's impact on learning, earlier research in Canada found student achievement gains were ''significantly greater'' in classrooms where artificial lighting most closely approximated sunlight. The 1991 study conducted for Alberta's Education Department, subtitled ''A Case of Daylight Robbery,'' examined the impact of different artificial lighting systems on elementary school pupils' test scores, health and attendance.

The new daylight study, commissioned by the Pacific Gas and Electric Co., occurs amid a nationwide school building spree to accommodate record enrollments. School construction spending has reached $20.5 billion this year.

The study's central finding runs counter to a theory of school design popular in the 1970s - eliminating classroom windows so that students would not be distracted.

Test results were analyzed for 21,000 students in Seattle, Fort Collins, Colo., and Orange County, Calif., areas with divergent weather patterns. Within each of the three districts, the results of students in classrooms that let in varying amounts of daylight were compared.

More daylight appeared to have the greatest effect in the Capistrano district in Orange County. ''We found that students with the most daylighting in their classrooms progressed 20 percent faster on math tests and 26 percent [faster] on reading tests in one year than those with the least,'' the researchers concluded. ''Similarly, students in classrooms with the largest window areas were found to progress 15 percent faster in math and 23 percent faster in reading.''

In Seattle and Fort Collins, the impact of daylight was smaller, raising scores from 7 percent to 18 percent. The study used a sophisticated statistical method called regression analysis to control for the social characteristics of students, variations in class size and other factors known to effect learning.

''We were completely taken aback at the magnitude of these findings ... I would have been delighted to find a 5 percent effect,'' said Lisa Heschong, one of the study's authors.

This story ran on page A33 of the Boston Globe on 11/26/99.
Copyright 1999 Globe Newspaper Company.

[ Send this story to a friend | Easy-print version | Add to Daily User ]


Click here for advertiser information

Copyright 1999 Globe Newspaper Company
Boston Globe Extranet
Extending our newspaper services to the web
Return to the home page
of The Globe Online